Data sovereignty used to be a specialist concern in many technology buying processes. It was important in regulated industries and the public sector, but in many sales conversations it was treated as a compliance question to be addressed at a later stage, if at all.
Data sovereignty used to be a specialist concern in many technology buying processes. It was important in regulated industries and the public sector, but in many sales conversations it was treated as a compliance question to be addressed at a later stage, if at all.
That is changing. Across Europe, customers are looking more closely at how technology providers handle data. They want to understand how data is processed, who can access it, which laws may apply, what third-party services are involved and whether a provider understands the local market where the solution will be used.
This shift is especially relevant for cloud communications. Voice recordings, transcripts, summaries, AI services, CRM integrations, APIs and workflow tools can all become part of the data chain. What looks simple from the user interface can involve several systems and providers behind the scenes.
As if this wasn’t enough, AI makes the discussion even more pressing. Voice AI, transcription, summarisation, AI assistants and intelligent routing all create new questions about data flows, model hosting, metadata, retention and cross-border processing. While innovation remains valuable, customers increasingly want to understand and trust the operating model behind it.
For channel partners and service providers, this creates both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge is that sovereignty can no longer be answered with vague reassurance. The opportunity is that partners who can help customers map requirements, data flows, control points and local obligations become more valuable early in the buying process.
In the new paper “Understanding Data Sovereignty in Europe” industry analyst and advisor Chris Marron explains why sovereignty is becoming a strategic issue for cloud communications, how AI is sharpening the debate and what partners, providers and customers need to consider now.
The industry treats regulatory complexity as a tax on growth — a cost to minimise, delay, or push onto whichever partner will absorb it most cheaply. That instinct is backwards, and it's costing operators deals they should be winning.
Eighty percent of people don't answer calls from numbers they don't recognise (Pew Research). For calls carrying a "Spam Likely" label, the answer rate drops into the single digits the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) puts it at roughly 9%.
Somewhere in your customer base, a stop-sell date is already active — and the customer probably doesn't know it yet. Across multiple markets, incumbent operators are retiring the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), the copper-based infrastructure that has carried voice calls for over a century.